PtP and RMS
From:   https://www.analog.com/en/analog-dialogue/raqs/raq-issue-177.html



RMS Power vs. Average Power
by Doug Ito Download PDF



QUESTION: Should I use units of root mean square (rms) power to specify or describe the ac power associated with my signal, system, or device? RAQ Issue: 177
Answer: It depends on how you define rms power. You do not want to calculate the rms value of the ac power waveform. This produces a result that is not physically meaningful. You do use the rms values of voltage and/or current to calculate average power, which does produce meaningful results.
Discussion: How much power is dissipated when a 1 V rms sinusoidal voltage is placed across a 1 Ω resistor? Equation 1 This is well understood1 and there is no controversy here. Now, let’s see how this compares with the value from an rms power calculation. Figure 1 shows a graph of a 1 V rms sinusoid. The peak-to-peak value is 1 V rms × 2 √2 = 2.828 V, swinging from +1.414 V to –1.414 V.2 Figure 1. Graph of a 1 V rms sinusoid. Figure 2 is a graph of the power dissipated by this 1 V rms sinusoid across a 1 Ω resistor (P = V2/R) that shows: Figure 2. Graph of the power dissipated by a 1 V rms sinusoid across a 1 Ω resistor. The power dissipated by a sinusoidal 1 V rms across a 1 Ω resistor is 1 W, not 1.225 W. Thus, it is the average power that produces the correct value, and thus it is average power that has physical significance. The rms power (as defined here) has no obvious useful meaning (no obvious physical/electrical significance), other than being a quantity that can be calculated as an exercise. It is a trivial exercise to perform the same analysis using a 1 A rms sinusoidal current through a 1 Ω resistor. The result is the same. Power supplies for integrated circuits (ICs) are generally dc, so rms power is not an issue for IC power. For dc, average and rms are the same value as dc. The importance of using average power, as opposed to rms power as defined in this document, applies to power associated with time-varying voltage and current—that is, noise, RF signals, and oscillators. Use rms voltage and/or rms current to calculate average power, resulting in meaningful power values. 1 Power dissipated from voltage across a resistor is a fundamental relation that is easily derived from Ohm’s law (V = IR) and the fundamental definitions of voltage (energy/unit of charge) and current (unit of charge/time). Voltage × current = energy/time = power 2 The peak-to-peak amplitude of a sinusoid is the rms value multiplied by 2√2. For a sinusoidal voltage, V p-p = V rms × 2√2, where V p-p is the peak-to-peak voltage and V rms is the rms voltage. This is a well-known relation that is documented in countless text books, as well as here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_mean_square. 3 This is adapted from the rms value calculated from a constant dc offset value plus a separate rms ac value and in the application note “Make Better AC RMS Measurements with Your Digital Multimeter” by Keysight. 4 The standard textbook definition is one example of a more detailed formula. Equation 3 Author Doug Ito Doug Ito is an applications engineer for the High Speed ADC team at Analog Devices, Inc., San Diego, California. He earned a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from San Diego State University. Doug is a member of ADI’s EngineerZone® High Speed ADC Support Community. =======================================================
WiKi: Root mean square From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In mathematics and its applications, the root mean square of a set of numbers x i x_{i} (abbreviated as RMS, RMS or rms and denoted in formulas as either x R M S {\displaystyle x_{\mathrm {RMS} }} or R M S x {\displaystyle \mathrm {RMS} _{x}}) is defined as the square root of the mean square (the arithmetic mean of the squares) of the set.[1] The RMS is also known as the quadratic mean (denoted M 2 M_{2})[2][3] and is a particular case of the generalized mean. The RMS of a continuously varying function (denoted f R M S {\displaystyle f_ {\mathrm {RMS} }}) can be defined in terms of an integral of the squares of the instantaneous values during a cycle. For alternating electric current, RMS is equal to the value of the constant direct current that would produce the same power dissipation in a resistive load.[1] In estimation theory, the root-mean-square deviation of an estimator is a measure of the imperfection of the fit of the estimator to the data.
Definition The RMS value of a set of values (or a continuous-time waveform) is the square root of the arithmetic mean of the squares of the values, or the square of the function that defines the continuous waveform. In physics, the RMS current value can also be defined as the "value of the direct current that dissipates the same power in a resistor." In the case of a set of n values { x 1 , x 2 , … , x n } \{x_{1},x_{2},\dots ,x_{n}\}, the RMS is x RMS = 1 n ( x 1 2 + x 2 2 + ⋯ + x n 2 ) . {\displaystyle x_{\text{RMS}}={\sqrt {{\frac {1}{n}}\left({x_{1}}^{2}+{x_{2}}^{2}+\cdots +{x_{n}}^{2}\right)}}.} The corresponding formula for a continuous function (or waveform) f(t) defined over the interval T 1 ≤ t ≤ T 2 T_{1}\leq t\leq T_{2} is f RMS = 1 T 2 − T 1 ∫ T 1 T 2 [ f ( t ) ] 2 d t , {\displaystyle f_{\text{RMS}}={\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2}-T_{1}}}{\int _{T_{1}}^{T_{2}}{[f(t)]}^{2}\,{\rm {d}}t}}},} and the RMS for a function over all time is f RMS = lim T → ∞ 1 2 T ∫ − T T [ f ( t ) ] 2 d t . {\displaystyle f_{\text{RMS}}=\lim _{T\rightarrow \infty }{\sqrt {{1 \over {2T}}{\int _{ -T}^{T}{[f(t)]}^{2}\,{\rm {d}}t}}}.} The RMS over all time of a periodic function is equal to the RMS of one period of the function. The RMS value of a continuous function or signal can be approximated by taking the RMS of a sample consisting of equally spaced observations. Additionally, the RMS value of various waveforms can also be determined without calculus, as shown by Cartwright.[4] In the case of the RMS statistic of a random process, the expected value is used instead of the mean.
In common waveforms
If the waveform is a pure sine wave, the relationships between amplitudes
(peak-to-peak, peak) and RMS are fixed and known, as they are for any
continuous periodic wave. However, this is not true for an arbitrary
waveform, which may not be periodic or continuous. For a zero-mean sine
wave, the relationship between RMS and peak-to-peak amplitude is:

 Peak-to-peak = 2 2 × RMS ≈ 2.8 × RMS . {\displaystyle =2{\sqrt
{2}}\times {\text{RMS}}\approx 2.8\times {\text{RMS}}.}

For other waveforms, the relationships are not the same as they are for
sine
waves. For example, for either a triangular or sawtooth wave

 Peak-to-peak = 2 3 × RMS ≈ 3.5 × RMS . {\displaystyle =2{\sqrt
{3}}\times {\text{RMS}}\approx 3.5\times {\text{RMS}}.}

Waveform 	Variables and operators 	RMS
DC 	y = A 0 {\displaystyle y=A_{0}\,} 	A 0 {\displaystyle A_{0}\,}
Sine wave 	y = A 1 sin ⁡ ( 2 π f t ) {\displaystyle y=A_{1}\sin(2\pi
ft)\,} 	A 1 2 {\displaystyle {\frac {A_{1}}{\sqrt {2}}}}
Square wave 	y = { A 1 frac ⁡ ( f t ) < 0.5 − A 1 frac ⁡ ( f t ) > 0.5 {\displaystyle
y={\begin{cases}A_{1}&\operatorname {frac} (ft)<0.5\\-A_{1}&\operatorname 
{frac} (ft)>0.5\end{cases}}} 	A 1
{\displaystyle A_{1}\,}
DC-shifted square wave 	y = A 0 + { A 1 frac ⁡ ( f t ) < 0.5 − A 1 frac ⁡ ( f t ) > 0.5
{\displaystyle y=A_{0}+{\begin{cases}A_{1}&\operatorname {frac} (ft)
<0.5\\-A_{1}&\operatorname {frac}
(ft)>0.5\end{cases}}} 	A 0 2 + A 1 2 {\displaystyle {\sqrt
{A_{0}^{2}+A_{1}^{2}}}\,}
Modified sine wave 	y = { 0 frac ⁡ ( f t ) < 0.25 A 1 0.25 < frac ⁡ ( f
t ) < 0.5 0 0.5 < frac ⁡ ( f t ) < 0.75 − A 1 frac ⁡ ( f t ) > 0.75
{\displaystyle y={\begin{cases}0&\operatorname {frac} (ft)<
0.25\\A_{1}&0.25<operatorname {frac} (ft)<0.5\\0&0.5<operatorname {frac}
(ft)<0.75\\-A_{1}&\operatorname {frac} (ft)>0.75\end{cases}}} 	A 1 2
{\displaystyle {\frac {A_{1}}{\sqrt {2}}}}
Triangle wave 	y = | 2 A 1 frac ⁡ ( f t ) − A 1 | {\displaystyle
y=\left|2A_{1}\operatorname {frac} (ft)-A_{1}\right|} 	A 1 3 {\displaystyle
A_{1} \over {\sqrt {3}}}
Sawtooth wave 	y = 2 A 1 frac ⁡ ( f t ) − A 1 {\displaystyle
y=2A_{1}\operatorname {frac} (ft)-A_{1}\,} 	A 1 3 {\displaystyle A_{1}
\over
{\sqrt {3}}}
Pulse wave 	y = { A 1 frac ⁡ ( f t ) < D 0 frac ⁡ ( f t ) > D
{\displaystyle y={\begin{cases}A_{1}&\operatorname {frac} (
ft)<D\\0&\operatorname {frac} (ft)>D\end{cases}}} 	A 1 D {\displaystyle
A_{1}{\sqrt {D}}}
Phase-to-phase sine wave 	y = A 1 sin ⁡ ( t ) − A 1 sin ⁡ ( t − 2
π
3 ) {\displaystyle y=A_{1}\sin(t)-A_{1}\sin \left(t-{\frac {2\pi
}{3}}\right)\,} 	A 1 3 2 {\displaystyle A_{1}{\sqrt {\frac {3}{2}}}}
where:

 y is displacement,
 t is time,
 f is frequency,
 Ai is amplitude (peak value),
 D is the duty cycle or the proportion of the time period (1/f) spent high,
 frac(r) is the fractional part of r.
Sine, square, triangle, and sawtooth waveforms. In each, the centerline is at 0, the positive peak is at y = A 1 {\displaystyle y=A_{1}} and the negative peak is at y = − A 1 {\displaystyle y=-A_{1}} A rectangular pulse wave of duty cycle D, the ratio between the pulse duration ( τ \tau ) and the period (T); illustrated here with a = 1. Graph of a sine wave's voltage vs. time (in degrees), showing RMS, peak (PK), and peak-to-peak (PP) voltages.

In waveform combinations Waveforms made by summing known simple waveforms have an RMS value that is the root of the sum of squares of the component RMS values, if the component waveforms are orthogonal (that is, if the average of the product of one simple waveform with another is zero for all pairs other than a waveform times itself).[5] RMS Total = RMS 1 2 + RMS 2 2 + ⋯ + RMS n 2 {\displaystyle {\text{RMS}}_{\text{Total}}={\sqrt {{\text{RMS}}_{1} ^{2}+{\text{RMS}}_{2}^{2}+\cdots +{\text{RMS}}_{n}^{2}}}} Alternatively, for waveforms that are perfectly positively correlated, or "in phase" with each other, their RMS values sum directly.
Uses
In electrical engineering Voltage Further information: Root mean square AC voltage A special case of RMS of waveform combinations is:[6] RMS AC+DC = V DC 2 + RMS AC 2 {\displaystyle {\text {RMS}}_{\text{AC+DC}}={\sqrt {{\text{V}}_{\text{DC}} ^{2}+{\text{RMS}}_{\text{AC}}^{2}}}} where V DC {\displaystyle {\text{V}}_{\text{DC}}} refers to the direct current (or average) component of the signal, and RMS AC {\displaystyle {\text{RMS}}_{\text{AC}}} is the alternating current component of the signal.
Average electrical power Further information: AC power Electrical engineers often need to know the power, P, dissipated by an electrical resistance, R. It is easy to do the calculation when there is a constant current, I, through the resistance. For a load of R ohms, power is given by: P = I 2 R . P=I^{2}R. However, if the current is a time-varying function, I(t), this formula must be extended to reflect the fact that the current (and thus the instantaneous power) is varying over time. If the function is periodic (such as household AC power), it is still meaningful to discuss the average power dissipated over time, which is calculated by taking the average power dissipation: P a v = ( I ( t ) 2 R ) a v where ( ⋯ ) a v denotes the temporal mean of a function = ( I ( t ) 2 ) a v R (as R does not vary over time, it can be factored out) = I RMS 2 R by definition of root-mean-square {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}P_{av}&=\left(I(t)^{2}R\right)_{av}&&{\text{where }}\left(\cdots \right)_{av}{\text{ denotes the temporal mean of a function}}\\[3pt]&=\left(I(t)^{2}\right)_{av}R&&{\text{(as }}R{\text{ does not vary over time, it can be factored out)}}\\[3pt]&=I_{\te xt{RMS}}^{2}R&&{\text{by definition of root-mean-square}}\end{aligned}}} So, the RMS value, IRMS, of the function I(t) is the constant current that yields the same power dissipation as the time-averaged power dissipation of the current I(t). Average power can also be found using the same method that in the case of a time-varying voltage, V(t), with RMS value VRMS, P Avg = V RMS 2 R . {\displaystyle P_{\text{Avg}}={V_{\text{RMS}}^{2} \over R}.} This equation can be used for any periodic waveform, such as a sinusoidal or sawtooth waveform, allowing us to calculate the mean power delivered into a specified load. By taking the square root of both these equations and multiplying them together, the power is found to be: P Avg = V RMS I RMS . {\displaystyle P_{\text{Avg}} =V_{\text{RMS}}I_{\text{RMS}}.} Both derivations depend on voltage and current being proportional (that is, the load, R, is purely resistive). Reactive loads (that is, loads capable of not just dissipating energy but also storing it) are discussed under the topic of AC power. In the common case of alternating current when I(t) is a sinusoidal current, as is approximately true for mains power, the RMS value is easy to calculate from the continuous case equation above. If Ip is defined to be the peak current, then: I RMS = 1 T 2 − T 1 ∫ T 1 T 2 [ I p sin ⁡ ( ω t ) ] 2 d t , {\displaystyle I_{\text{RMS}}={\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2}-T_{1}}}\int _{T_{1}}^{T_{2}}\left[I_{\text{p}}\sin(\omega t)\right]^{2}dt}},} where t is time and ω is the angular frequency (ω = 2π/T, where T is the period of the wave). Since Ip is a positive constant: I RMS = I p 1 T 2 − T 1 ∫ T 1 T 2 sin 2 ⁡ ( ω t ) d t . {\displaystyle I_{\text{RMS}}=I_{\text{p}}{\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2} -T_{1}}}{\int _{T_{1}}^{T_{2}}{\sin ^{2}(\omega t)}\,dt}}}.} Using a trigonometric identity to eliminate squaring of trig function: I RMS = I p 1 T 2 − T 1 ∫ T 1 T 2 1 − cos ⁡ ( 2 ω t ) 2 d t = I p 1 T 2 − T 1 [ t 2 − sin ⁡ ( 2 ω t ) 4 ω ] T 1 T 2 {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}I_{\text{RMS}}&=I_{\text{p}}{\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2} -T_{1}}}{\int _{T_{1}}^{T_{2}}{1-\cos(2\omega t) \over 2 }\,dt}}}\\[3pt]&=I_{\text{p}}{\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2}-T_{1}}}\left[{t \over 2}-{\sin(2\omega t) \over 4\omega }\right]_{T_{1}}^{T_{2}}}}\end{aligned}}} but since the interval is a whole number of complete cycles (per definition of RMS), the sine terms will cancel out, leaving: I RMS = I p 1 T 2 − T 1 [ t 2 ] T 1 T 2 = I p 1 T 2 − T 1 T 2 − T 1 2 = I p2 . {\displaystyle I_{\text{RMS}}=I_{\text{p}}{\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2} -T_{1}}}\left[{t \over 2}\right]_{T_{1}}^{T_{2}}}}=I_{\text{p}}{\sqrt {{1 \over {T_{2}-T_{1}}}{{T_{2}-T_{1}} \over 2}}}={I_{\text{p}} \over {\sqrt {2}}}.} A similar analysis leads to the analogous equation for sinusoidal voltage: V RMS = V p 2 , {\displaystyle V_{\text{RMS}}={V_{\text{p}} \over {\sqrt {2}}},} where IP represents the peak current and VP represents the peak voltage. Because of their usefulness in carrying out power calculations, listed voltages for power outlets (for example, 120 V in the US, or 230 V in Europe) are almost always quoted in RMS values, and not peak values. Peak values can be calculated from RMS values from the above formula, which implies VP = VRMS × √2, assuming the source is a pure sine wave. Thus the peak value of the mains voltage in the USA is about 120 × √2, or about 170 volts. The peak-to-peak voltage, being double this, is about 340 volts. A similar calculation indicates that the peak mains voltage in Europe is about 325 volts, and the peak-to-peak mains voltage, about 650 volts. RMS quantities such as electric current are usually calculated over one cycle. However, for some purposes the RMS current over a longer period is required when calculating transmission power losses. The same principle applies, and (for example) a current of 10 amps used for 12 hours each 24 -hour day represents an average current of 5 amps, but an RMS current of 7.07 amps, in the long term. The term RMS power is sometimes erroneously used in the audio industry as a synonym for mean power or average power (it is proportional to the square of the RMS voltage or RMS current in a resistive load). For a discussion of audio power measurements and their shortcomings, see Audio power.
Speed Main article: Root-mean-square speed In the physics of gas molecules, the root-mean-square speed is defined as the square root of the average squared-speed. The RMS speed of an ideal gas is calculated using the following equation: v RMS = 3 R T M {\displaystyle v_{\text{RMS}}={\sqrt {3RT \over M}}} where R represents the gas constant, 8.314 J/(mol·K), T is the temperature of the gas in kelvins, and M is the molar mass of the gas in kilograms per mole. In physics, speed is defined as the scalar magnitude of velocity. For a stationary gas, the average speed of its molecules can be in the order of thousands of km/h, even though the average velocity of its molecules is zero.
Error Main article: Root-mean-square deviation When two data sets — one set from theoretical prediction and the other from actual measurement of some physical variable, for instance — are compared, the RMS of the pairwise differences of the two data sets can serve as a measure of how far on average the error is from 0. The mean of the absolute values of the pairwise differences could be a useful measure of the variability of the differences. However, the RMS of the differences is usually the preferred measure, probably due to mathematical convention and compatibility with other formulae.
In frequency domain The RMS can be computed in the frequency domain, using Parseval's theorem. For a sampled signal x [ n ] = x ( t = n T ) {\displaystyle x[n]=x(t=nT)}, where T T is the sampling period, ∑ n = 1 N x 2 [ n ] = 1 N ∑ m = 1 N | X [ m ] | 2 , {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{N}{x^{2}[n]}={\frac {1}{N}}\sum _{m=1}^{N}\left|X[m]\right|^{2},} where X [ m ] = FFT ⁡ { x [ n ] } {\displaystyle X[m]=\operatorname {FFT} \{x[n]\}} and N is the sample size, that is, the number of observations in the sample and FFT coefficients. In this case, the RMS computed in the time domain is the same as in the frequency domain: RMS { x [ n ] } = 1 N ∑ n x 2 [ n ] = 1 N 2 ∑ m | X [ m ] | 2 = ∑ m | X [ m ] N | 2 . {\displaystyle {\text{RMS}}\{x[n]\}={\sqrt {{\frac {1}{N}}\sum _{n}{x^{2}[n]}}}={\sqrt {{\frac {1}{N^{2}}}\sum _{m}{{\bigl |}X[m]{\bigr |}}^{2}}}={\sqrt {\sum _{m}{\left|{\frac {X[m]}{N}}\right|^{2}}}}.}
Relationship to other statistics See also: Accuracy
If x ¯ {\bar {x}} is the arithmetic mean and σ x \sigma _{x} is the standard deviation of a population or a waveform, then:[7] x rms 2 = x ¯ 2 + σ x 2 = x 2 ¯ . {\displaystyle x_{\text{rms}}^{2}={\overline {x}}^{2}+\sigma _{x}^{2}={\overline {x^{2}}}.} From this it is clear that the RMS value is always greater than or equal to the average, in that the RMS includes the "error" / square deviation as well. Physical scientists often use the term root mean square as a synonym for standard deviation when it can be assumed the input signal has zero mean, that is, referring to the square root of the mean squared deviation of a signal from a given baseline or fit.[8][9] This is useful for electrical engineers in calculating the "AC only" RMS of a signal. Standard deviation being the RMS of a signal's variation about the mean, rather than about 0, the DC component is removed (that is, RMS(signal) = stdev(signal) if the mean signal is 0). Geometric proof without words that max (a,b) > root mean square (RMS) or quadratic mean (QM) > arithmetic mean (AM) > geometric mean (GM) > harmonic mean (HM) > min (a,b) of two distinct positive numbers a and b [note 1]

See also =======================================================
Make Better AC RMS Measurements with Your Digital Multimeter Application Notes Introduction If you use a digital multimeter (DMM) for AC voltage measurements, it is important to know what type of reading your meter is giving you so that you can properly interpret the results. Is your meter is giving you peak value, average value, root-mean-square (RMS) value, or something else? If the answer is “something else,” you may be in trouble, and the trouble usually happens with AC rms measurements. This application note will help you understand the different techniques DMMs use to measure rms values, how the signal affects the quality of your measurements, and how to avoid common measurement mistakes. Measuring AC RMS Measuring AC rms values is more complicated than it appears at first glance. If it is complicated, why do we bother? Because true rms is the only AC voltage reading that does not depend on the shape of the signal. It often is the most useful measurement for real-world waveforms. Often, rms is described as a measure of equivalent heating value, with a relationship to the amount of power dissipated by a resistive load driven by the equivalent DC value. For example, a 1Vpk sine wave will deliver the same power to a resistive load as a 0.707Vdc signal. A reliable rms reading on a signal will give you a better idea of the effect the signal will have in your circuit. Figure 1 shows four common voltage parameters. Peak voltage (Vpk) and peakto-peak voltage (Vpk-pk) are simple. Vavg is the average of all the instantaneous values in one complete cycle of the waveform. You will learn how we calculate Vrms below. For sine waves, the negative half of the waveform cancels out the positive half and averages to zero over one cycle. This type of average would not provide much insight into the signal’s effective amplitude, so most meters compute Vavg based on the absolute value of the waveform. For a sine wave, this works out to Vpk x 0.637 (Figure 2). You can derive Vrms by squaring every point in the waveform, finding the average (mean) value of the squares, then finding the square root of the average. With pure sine waves, you can take a couple of shortcuts: just multiply Vpk x 0.707 or Vavg x 1.11. Inexpensive peak-responding or average -responding meters rely on these scaling factors. The scaling factors apply only to pure sine waves. For every other type of signal, using this approach produces misleading answers. If you are using a meter that is not really designed for the task, you easily can end up with significant error—as high as 40 percent or more—depending on the meter and the signal. The ratio of Vpk to Vrms known as the crest factor, is important to measurement accuracy. The crest factor is a measure of how high the waveform peaks, relative to its RMS value. The higher the crest factor, the more difficult it is to make an accurate AC measurement. Two measurement challenges are associated with high crest factors. The first involves input range. Imagine a pulse train with a very low duty cycle but a relatively high peak amplitude. Signals like this force the meter to simultaneously measure a high peak value and a much lower rms value, possibly creating overload problems on the high end and resolution problems on the low end. The second challenge is the amount of higher-frequency energy in the signal. In general, high crest factors indicate more harmonics, which can cause trouble for all meters. Peak- and average-responding meters that are trying to measure rms have a particularly hard time.
Tips for Making Better AC RMS Measurements Given the importance—and difficulty—of measuring rms, what is the best way to proceed with your day-to-day measurement tasks? The following tips will help you achieve better results.